|
Los Angeles Kings Hockey Results |
When Los Angeles Kings played on Friday |
ATS Record: 30-23-1 |
SU Record: 27-25-2 |
O/U Record: 21-28-5 |
Sr No. |
Date |
Home |
Road |
Line |
Total |
FLML |
TotalML |
HS |
RS |
ATSwinner |
SUwinner |
O/U |
1 |
1996-10-04 |
LOS ANGELES |
NY ISLANDERS |
-0.5 |
7 |
-150 |
-115 |
1 |
0 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U |
2 |
1996-11-08 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
6 |
110 |
-120 |
7 |
4 |
ANAHEIM |
ANAHEIM |
O
|
3 |
1996-12-20 |
BUFFALO |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
6 |
-145 |
120 |
6 |
2 |
BUFFALO |
BUFFALO |
O
|
4 |
1997-10-17 |
LOS ANGELES |
PHILADELPHIA |
0.5 |
5.5 |
115 |
-130 |
5 |
1 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
5 |
1997-10-31 |
DETROIT |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
5.5 |
120 |
-110 |
1 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
6 |
1998-10-16 |
LOS ANGELES |
BOSTON |
0.0 |
5.5 |
-135 |
110 |
2 |
1 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
7 |
1998-10-23 |
TAMPA BAY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
125 |
-110 |
3 |
2 |
TAMPA BAY |
TAMPA BAY |
T
|
8 |
1998-10-30 |
LOS ANGELES |
TAMPA BAY |
0.0 |
5 |
-180 |
-125 |
0 |
3 |
TAMPA BAY |
TAMPA BAY |
U
|
9 |
1999-01-29 |
WASHINGTON |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
-170 |
-130 |
3 |
6 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
10 |
1999-02-26 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
-120 |
-130 |
1 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
11 |
1999-04-16 |
SAN JOSE |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
-185 |
110 |
0 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
12 |
1999-10-15 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
120 |
-110 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
13 |
1999-10-22 |
LOS ANGELES |
PHOENIX |
0.0 |
5 |
-130 |
-110 |
3 |
6 |
PHOENIX |
PHOENIX |
O
|
14 |
1999-12-03 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
-120 |
-140 |
1 |
1 |
TIE |
TIE |
U
|
15 |
1999-12-10 |
DETROIT |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
-185 |
110 |
3 |
1 |
DETROIT |
DETROIT |
U
|
16 |
2000-02-11 |
LOS ANGELES |
DALLAS |
0.0 |
5 |
105 |
-130 |
3 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
T
|
17 |
2000-02-18 |
DETROIT |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
-240 |
-150 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
18 |
2000-02-25 |
VANCOUVER |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
115 |
-120 |
2 |
5 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
19 |
2000-03-17 |
LOS ANGELES |
ST LOUIS |
0.0 |
5.5 |
125 |
100 |
0 |
4 |
ST LOUIS |
ST LOUIS |
U
|
20 |
2000-04-07 |
LOS ANGELES |
DALLAS |
0.0 |
5 |
115 |
-115 |
3 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
T
|
21 |
2000-10-06 |
WASHINGTON |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
-130 |
100 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
22 |
2000-10-13 |
LOS ANGELES |
BOSTON |
0.0 |
5.5 |
-150 |
-120 |
5 |
0 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
23 |
2000-12-22 |
MINNESOTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
135 |
100 |
4 |
3 |
MINNESOTA |
MINNESOTA |
O
|
24 |
2000-12-29 |
DALLAS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
-260 |
100 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
25 |
2001-02-16 |
MINNESOTA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5.5 |
115 |
100 |
0 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
26 |
2001-05-04 |
COLORADO |
LOS ANGELES |
0.0 |
5 |
-300 |
-120 |
0 |
1 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
27 |
2001-10-26 |
FLORIDA |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-115 |
100 |
3 |
2 |
FLORIDA |
FLORIDA |
U
|
28 |
2002-02-08 |
PHOENIX |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
4.5 |
120 |
-120 |
6 |
5 |
PHOENIX |
PHOENIX |
O
|
29 |
2002-10-25 |
NY RANGERS |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
6 |
120 |
100 |
2 |
6 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
30 |
2002-11-08 |
OTTAWA |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
5 |
-120 |
-130 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
T
|
31 |
2002-11-29 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
5 |
125 |
100 |
2 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
TIE |
U
|
32 |
2003-02-07 |
LOS ANGELES |
CAROLINA |
-0.5 |
5 |
-120 |
-120 |
8 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O
|
33 |
2003-02-21 |
BUFFALO |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
5 |
105 |
100 |
1 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
T
|
34 |
2003-03-14 |
WASHINGTON |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
5 |
-155 |
100 |
1 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
35 |
2003-04-04 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
5 |
100 |
100 |
2 |
1 |
CALGARY |
CALGARY |
U
|
36 |
2003-10-10 |
PITTSBURGH |
LOS ANGELES |
0.5 |
5.5 |
-135 |
120 |
0 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U
|
37 |
2003-11-21 |
DALLAS |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
5 |
-130 |
115 |
3 |
1 |
DALLAS |
DALLAS |
U
|
38 |
2003-12-26 |
SAN JOSE |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.5 |
4.5 |
105 |
-120 |
5 |
0 |
SAN JOSE |
SAN JOSE |
O
|
39 |
2004-01-16 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
0.50 |
4.5 |
-140 |
-120 |
3 |
2 |
COLUMBUS |
COLUMBUS |
O
|
40 |
2004-02-13 |
BUFFALO |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.50 |
5 |
105 |
100 |
8 |
3 |
BUFFALO |
BUFFALO |
O
|
41 |
2004-04-02 |
LOS ANGELES |
CALGARY |
0.50 |
4.5 |
-125 |
-130 |
2 |
3 |
CALGARY |
CALGARY |
O
|
42 |
2004-03-26 |
EDMONTON |
LOS ANGELES |
-0.50 |
5 |
-140 |
-110 |
3 |
1 |
EDMONTON |
EDMONTON |
U
|
43 |
2005-10-28 |
LOS ANGELES |
SAN JOSE |
-1.5 |
6 |
-175 |
155 |
4 |
5 |
SAN JOSE |
SAN JOSE |
O |
44 |
2005-11-11 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
1.5 |
6.5 |
135 |
-155 |
2 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U |
45 |
2005-12-02 |
OTTAWA |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
6.5 |
-240 |
200 |
5 |
1 |
OTTAWA |
OTTAWA |
U |
46 |
2005-12-16 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
6 |
-115 |
-105 |
3 |
4 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
O |
47 |
2005-12-23 |
EDMONTON |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
6 |
-150 |
130 |
5 |
3 |
EDMONTON |
EDMONTON |
O |
48 |
2006-10-06 |
ANAHEIM |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
6 |
-200 |
170 |
4 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
ANAHEIM |
O |
49 |
2006-10-27 |
COLUMBUS |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
6 |
-150 |
130 |
2 |
0 |
COLUMBUS |
COLUMBUS |
U |
50 |
2006-11-24 |
DALLAS |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
5.5 |
-270 |
230 |
5 |
3 |
DALLAS |
DALLAS |
O |
51 |
2006-12-29 |
CALGARY |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
5.5 |
-280 |
240 |
6 |
4 |
CALGARY |
CALGARY |
O |
52 |
2007-01-26 |
VANCOUVER |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
5.5 |
-240 |
200 |
2 |
3 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U |
53 |
2007-03-09 |
DETROIT |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
5.5 |
-330 |
270 |
3 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
DETROIT |
U |
54 |
2007-03-23 |
CHICAGO |
LOS ANGELES |
-1.5 |
5.5 |
-120 |
100 |
1 |
2 |
LOS ANGELES |
LOS ANGELES |
U |
|
|
|
| | |
|
|
Copyright© 2004, 2005 www.atsstats.com all rights reserved |
|
|